This is my blog on the views on prostitution. I think that if a woman or man will accept money for services of a sexual nature then it is a case of prostitution. In the case that money is exchanged with the intent on someone being there, and for no sexual nature whatso ever, then that to would be classed as escort services. Although this is another type of prostitution, i think that as long as there is no intention for sexual content between both parties, then it isn't prostitution.
If a male or female offers money with the intention on there being a sexual interaction, and the money is accepted, it is prostitution. But if the money is accepted and by the end of the night there has been no sexual activity, and the customer is not satisfied, i feel this can go onto the subject of stealing. Although prostitution is wrong, when both parties agree on what the money is for, and someone goes back on that, they've stolen the money through a false agreement. But also on this matter, if a customer doesn't make it clear enough that the money is for sex, then the person accepting the money is not abliged to have to go through with any sexual nature, as it was not in the deal.
to conclude, i feel that prostitution can only be classed as prostitution through a full agreement from both parties, that the money that is being used is for a sexual nature as there are many other words and statures for people who do things for money.
If a male or female offers money with the intention on there being a sexual interaction, and the money is accepted, it is prostitution. But if the money is accepted and by the end of the night there has been no sexual activity, and the customer is not satisfied, i feel this can go onto the subject of stealing. Although prostitution is wrong, when both parties agree on what the money is for, and someone goes back on that, they've stolen the money through a false agreement. But also on this matter, if a customer doesn't make it clear enough that the money is for sex, then the person accepting the money is not abliged to have to go through with any sexual nature, as it was not in the deal.
to conclude, i feel that prostitution can only be classed as prostitution through a full agreement from both parties, that the money that is being used is for a sexual nature as there are many other words and statures for people who do things for money.
No comments:
Post a Comment